Theory Progress

(*  Title:       CoreC++

    Author:      Daniel Wasserrab
    Maintainer:  Daniel Wasserrab <wasserra at fmi.uni-passau.de>

    Based on the Jinja theory J/Progress.thy by Tobias Nipkow 
*)

section ‹Progress of Small Step Semantics›

theory Progress imports Equivalence DefAss Conform begin


subsection ‹Some pre-definitions›

lemma final_refE:
  "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e : Class C; final e;
    ⋀r. e = ref r ⟹ Q;
    ⋀r. e = Throw r ⟹ Q ⟧ ⟹ Q"
by (simp add:final_def,auto,case_tac v,auto)


lemma finalRefE:
  "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e : T; is_refT T; final e;
  e = null ⟹ Q;
  ⋀r. e = ref r ⟹ Q;
  ⋀r. e = Throw r ⟹ Q⟧ ⟹ Q"

apply (cases T)
apply (simp add:is_refT_def)+
 apply (simp add:final_def)
 apply (erule disjE)
  apply clarsimp
 apply (erule exE)+
apply fastforce
apply (auto simp:final_def is_refT_def)
apply (case_tac v)
apply auto
done


lemma subE:
  "⟦ P ⊢ T ≤ T'; is_type P T'; wf_prog wf_md P;
     ⟦ T = T'; ∀C. T ≠ Class C ⟧ ⟹ Q;
     ⋀C D. ⟦ T = Class C; T' = Class D; P ⊢ Path C to D unique ⟧ ⟹ Q;
     ⋀C. ⟦ T = NT; T' = Class C ⟧ ⟹ Q ⟧ ⟹ Q"

apply(cases T')
apply auto
apply(drule_tac T = "T" in widen_Class)
apply auto
done


lemma assumes wf:"wf_prog wf_md P"
  and typeof:" P ⊢ typeof⇘h⇙ v = Some T'"
  and type:"is_type P T"
shows sub_casts:"P ⊢ T' ≤ T ⟹ ∃v'. P ⊢ T casts v to v'"

proof(erule subE)
  from type show "is_type P T" .
next
  from wf show "wf_prog wf_md P" .
next
  assume "T' = T" and "∀C. T' ≠ Class C"
  thus "∃v'. P ⊢ T casts v to v'" by(fastforce intro:casts_prim)
next
  fix C D
  assume T':"T' = Class C" and T:"T = Class D"
    and path_unique:"P ⊢ Path C to D unique"
  from T' typeof obtain a Cs where v:"v = Ref(a,Cs)" and last:"last Cs = C"
    by(auto dest!:typeof_Class_Subo)
  from last path_unique obtain Cs' where "P ⊢ Path last Cs to D via Cs'"
    by(auto simp:path_unique_def path_via_def)
  hence "P ⊢ Class D casts Ref(a,Cs) to Ref(a,Cs@⇩pCs')"
    by -(rule casts_ref,simp_all)
  with T v show "∃v'. P ⊢ T casts v to v'" by auto
next
  fix C
  assume "T' = NT" and T:"T = Class C"
  with typeof have "v = Null" by simp
  with T show "∃v'. P ⊢ T casts v to v'" by(fastforce intro:casts_null)
qed



text‹Derivation of new induction scheme for well typing:›

inductive
  WTrt' :: "[prog,env,heap,expr,     ty     ] ⇒ bool"
        ("_,_,_ ⊢ _ :'' _"   [51,51,51]50)
  and WTrts':: "[prog,env,heap,expr list,ty list] ⇒ bool"
        ("_,_,_ ⊢ _ [:''] _" [51,51,51]50)
  for P :: prog
where
  "is_class P C ⟹  P,E,h ⊢ new C :' Class C"
| "⟦is_class P C; P,E,h ⊢ e :' T; is_refT T⟧ 
   ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ Cast C e :' Class C"
| "⟦is_class P C; P,E,h ⊢ e :' T; is_refT T⟧ 
   ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ ⦇C⦈e :' Class C"
| "P ⊢ typeof⇘h⇙ v = Some T ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ Val v :' T"
| "E V = Some T  ⟹  P,E,h ⊢ Var V :' T"
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1 :' T⇩1;  P,E,h ⊢ e⇩2 :' T⇩2;
    case bop of Eq ⇒ T = Boolean
    | Add ⇒ T⇩1 = Integer ∧ T⇩2 = Integer ∧ T = Integer ⟧
   ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1 «bop» e⇩2 :' T"
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ Var V :' T; P,E,h ⊢ e :' T' ⌦‹V ≠ This›; P ⊢ T' ≤ T ⟧
   ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ V:=e :' T"
| "⟦P,E,h ⊢ e :' Class C; Cs ≠ []; P ⊢ C has least F:T via Cs⟧ 
  ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ e∙F{Cs} :' T"
| "P,E,h ⊢ e :' NT ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ e∙F{Cs} :' T"
| "⟦P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1 :' Class C; Cs ≠ []; P ⊢ C has least F:T via Cs;
    P,E,h ⊢ e⇩2 :' T'; P ⊢ T' ≤ T ⟧ 
  ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1∙F{Cs}:=e⇩2 :' T"
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1:'NT; P,E,h ⊢ e⇩2 :' T'; P ⊢ T' ≤ T ⟧ 
   ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1∙F{Cs}:=e⇩2 :' T"
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e :' Class C;  P ⊢ C has least M = (Ts,T,m) via Cs;
    P,E,h ⊢ es [:'] Ts'; P ⊢ Ts' [≤] Ts ⟧
    ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ e∙M(es) :' T" 
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e :' Class C'; P ⊢ Path C' to C unique;
    P ⊢ C has least M = (Ts,T,m) via Cs; 
    P,E,h ⊢ es [:'] Ts'; P ⊢ Ts' [≤] Ts ⟧
    ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ e∙(C::)M(es) :' T"
| "⟦P,E,h ⊢ e :' NT; P,E,h ⊢ es [:'] Ts⟧ ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ Call e Copt M es :' T"
| "⟦ P ⊢ typeof⇘h⇙ v = Some T'; P,E(V↦T),h ⊢ e⇩2 :' T⇩2; P ⊢ T' ≤ T; is_type P T ⟧
   ⟹  P,E,h ⊢ {V:T := Val v; e⇩2} :' T⇩2"
| "⟦ P,E(V↦T),h ⊢ e :' T'; ¬ assigned V e; is_type P T ⟧
   ⟹  P,E,h ⊢ {V:T; e} :' T'"
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1 :' T⇩1; P,E,h ⊢ e⇩2 :' T⇩2 ⟧  ⟹  P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1;;e⇩2 :' T⇩2"
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e :' Boolean;  P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1:' T;  P,E,h ⊢ e⇩2:' T ⟧
   ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ if (e) e⇩1 else e⇩2 :' T"
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e :' Boolean;  P,E,h ⊢ c:' T ⟧
   ⟹  P,E,h ⊢ while(e) c :' Void"
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e :' T'; is_refT T'⟧  ⟹  P,E,h ⊢ throw e :' T"

| "P,E,h ⊢ [] [:'] []"
| "⟦ P,E,h ⊢ e :' T;  P,E,h ⊢ es [:'] Ts ⟧ ⟹  P,E,h ⊢ e#es [:'] T#Ts"



lemmas WTrt'_induct = WTrt'_WTrts'.induct [split_format (complete)]
  and WTrt'_inducts = WTrt'_WTrts'.inducts [split_format (complete)]

inductive_cases WTrt'_elim_cases[elim!]:
  "P,E,h ⊢ V :=e :' T"


text‹... and some easy consequences:›

lemma [iff]: "P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1;;e⇩2 :' T⇩2 = (∃T⇩1. P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1:' T⇩1 ∧ P,E,h ⊢ e⇩2:' T⇩2)"

apply(rule iffI)
apply (auto elim: WTrt'.cases intro!:WTrt'_WTrts'.intros)
done


lemma [iff]: "P,E,h ⊢ Val v :' T = (P ⊢ typeof⇘h⇙ v = Some T)"

apply(rule iffI)
apply (auto elim: WTrt'.cases intro!:WTrt'_WTrts'.intros)
done


lemma [iff]: "P,E,h ⊢ Var V :' T = (E V = Some T)"

apply(rule iffI)
apply (auto elim: WTrt'.cases intro!:WTrt'_WTrts'.intros)
done



lemma wt_wt': "P,E,h ⊢ e : T ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ e :' T"
and wts_wts': "P,E,h ⊢ es [:] Ts ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ es [:'] Ts"

proof (induct rule:WTrt_inducts)
  case (WTrtBlock E V T h e T')
  thus ?case
    apply(case_tac "assigned V e")
    apply(auto intro:WTrt'_WTrts'.intros 
          simp add:fun_upd_same assigned_def simp del:fun_upd_apply)
    done
qed(auto intro:WTrt'_WTrts'.intros simp del:fun_upd_apply)


lemma wt'_wt: "P,E,h ⊢ e :' T ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ e : T"
and wts'_wts: "P,E,h ⊢ es [:'] Ts ⟹ P,E,h ⊢ es [:] Ts"

apply (induct rule:WTrt'_inducts)
apply (fastforce intro: WTrt_WTrts.intros)+
done



corollary wt'_iff_wt: "(P,E,h ⊢ e :' T) = (P,E,h ⊢ e : T)"
by(blast intro:wt_wt' wt'_wt)


corollary wts'_iff_wts: "(P,E,h ⊢ es [:'] Ts) = (P,E,h ⊢ es [:] Ts)"
by(blast intro:wts_wts' wts'_wts)

lemmas WTrt_inducts2 = WTrt'_inducts [unfolded wt'_iff_wt wts'_iff_wts,
  case_names WTrtNew WTrtDynCast WTrtStaticCast WTrtVal WTrtVar WTrtBinOp 
  WTrtLAss WTrtFAcc WTrtFAccNT WTrtFAss WTrtFAssNT WTrtCall WTrtStaticCall WTrtCallNT 
  WTrtInitBlock WTrtBlock WTrtSeq WTrtCond WTrtWhile WTrtThrow 
  WTrtNil WTrtCons, consumes 1]


subsection‹The theorem ‹progress››


lemma mdc_leq_dyn_type:
"P,E,h ⊢ e : T ⟹ 
  ∀C a Cs D S. T = Class C ∧ e = ref(a,Cs) ∧ h a = Some(D,S) ⟶ P ⊢ D ≼⇧* C"
and "P,E,h ⊢ es [:] Ts ⟹
  ∀T Ts' e es' C a Cs D S. Ts = T#Ts' ∧ es = e#es' ∧ 
                           T = Class C ∧ e = ref(a,Cs) ∧ h a = Some(D,S)
      ⟶ P ⊢ D ≼⇧* C"

proof (induct rule:WTrt_inducts2)
  case (WTrtVal h v T E)
  have type:"P ⊢ typeof⇘h⇙ v = Some T" by fact
  { fix C a Cs D S
    assume "T = Class C" and "Val v = ref(a,Cs)" and "h a = Some(D,S)"
    with type have "Subobjs P D Cs" and "C = last Cs" by (auto split:if_split_asm)
    hence "P ⊢ D ≼⇧* C" by simp (rule Subobjs_subclass) }
  thus ?case by blast
qed auto



lemma appendPath_append_last:
  assumes notempty:"Ds ≠ []" 
  shows"(Cs @⇩p Ds) @⇩p [last Ds] = (Cs @⇩p Ds)"

proof -
  have "last Cs = hd Ds ⟹ last (Cs @ tl Ds) = last Ds"
  proof(cases "tl Ds = []")
    case True
    assume last:"last Cs = hd Ds"
    with True notempty have "Ds = [last Cs]" by (fastforce dest:hd_Cons_tl)
    hence "last Ds = last Cs" by simp
    with True show ?thesis by simp
  next
    case False
    assume last:"last Cs = hd Ds"
    from notempty False have "last (tl Ds) = last Ds"
      by -(drule hd_Cons_tl,drule_tac x="hd Ds" in last_ConsR,simp)
    with False show ?thesis by simp
  qed
  thus ?thesis by(simp add:appendPath_def)
qed




theorem assumes wf: "wwf_prog P"
shows progress: "P,E,h ⊢ e : T ⟹
 (⋀l. ⟦ P ⊢ h √; P ⊢ E √; 𝒟 e ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ final e ⟧ ⟹ ∃e' s'. P,E ⊢ ⟨e,(h,l)⟩ → ⟨e',s'⟩)"
and "P,E,h ⊢ es [:] Ts ⟹
 (⋀l. ⟦ P ⊢ h √; P ⊢ E √; 𝒟s es ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ finals es ⟧ ⟹ ∃es' s'. P,E ⊢ ⟨es,(h,l)⟩ [→] ⟨es',s'⟩)"
proof (induct rule:WTrt_inducts2)
  case (WTrtNew C E h)
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "∃a. h a = None"
    with WTrtNew show ?thesis
      by (fastforce del:exE intro!:RedNew simp:new_Addr_def)
  next
    assume "¬(∃a. h a = None)"
    with WTrtNew show ?thesis
      by(fastforce intro:RedNewFail simp add:new_Addr_def)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtDynCast C E h e T)
  have wte: "P,E,h ⊢ e : T" and refT: "is_refT T" and "class": "is_class P C"
    and IH: "⋀l. ⟦P ⊢ h √; P ⊢ E √; 𝒟 e ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ final e⟧
                ⟹ ∃e' s'. P,E ⊢ ⟨e,(h,l)⟩ → ⟨e',s'⟩"
    and D: "𝒟 (Cast C e) ⌊dom l⌋" 
    and hconf: "P ⊢ h √" and envconf:"P ⊢ E √" by fact+
  from D have De: "𝒟 e ⌊dom l⌋" by auto
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e"
    with wte refT show ?thesis
    proof (rule finalRefE)
      assume "e = null" thus ?case by(fastforce intro:RedDynCastNull)
    next
      fix r assume "e = ref r"
      then obtain a Cs where ref:"e = ref(a,Cs)" by (cases r) auto
      with wte obtain D S where h:"h a = Some(D,S)" by auto
      show ?thesis
      proof (cases "P ⊢ Path D to C unique")
        case True
        then obtain Cs' where path:"P ⊢ Path D to C via Cs'"
          by (fastforce simp:path_via_def path_unique_def)
        then obtain Ds where "Ds = appendPath Cs Cs'" by simp
        with h path True ref show ?thesis by (fastforce intro:RedDynCast)
      next
        case False
        hence path_not_unique:"¬ P ⊢ Path D to C unique" .
        show ?thesis
        proof(cases "P ⊢ Path last Cs to C unique")
          case True
          then obtain Cs' where "P ⊢ Path last Cs to C via Cs'"
            by(auto simp:path_via_def path_unique_def)
          with True ref show ?thesis by(fastforce intro:RedStaticUpDynCast)
        next
          case False
          hence path_not_unique':"¬ P ⊢ Path last Cs to C unique" .
          thus ?thesis
          proof(cases "C ∉ set Cs")
            case False
            then obtain Ds Ds' where "Cs = Ds@[C]@Ds'"
              by (auto simp:in_set_conv_decomp)
            with ref show ?thesis by(fastforce intro:RedStaticDownDynCast)
          next
            case True
            with path_not_unique path_not_unique' h ref 
            show ?thesis by (fastforce intro:RedDynCastFail)
          qed
        qed
      qed
    next
      fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      thus ?thesis by(blast intro!:red_reds.DynCastThrow)
    qed
  next
    assume nf: "¬ final e"
    from IH[OF hconf envconf De nf] show ?thesis by (blast intro:DynCastRed)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtStaticCast C E h e T)
  have wte: "P,E,h ⊢ e : T" and refT: "is_refT T" and "class": "is_class P C"
   and IH: "⋀l. ⟦P ⊢ h √; P ⊢ E √; 𝒟 e ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ final e⟧
                ⟹ ∃e' s'. P,E ⊢ ⟨e,(h,l)⟩ → ⟨e',s'⟩"
   and D: "𝒟 (⦇C⦈e) ⌊dom l⌋" 
    and hconf: "P ⊢ h √" and envconf:"P ⊢ E √" by fact+
  from D have De: "𝒟 e ⌊dom l⌋" by auto
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e"
    with wte refT show ?thesis
    proof (rule finalRefE)
      assume "e = null" with "class" show ?case by(fastforce intro:RedStaticCastNull)
    next
      fix r assume "e = ref r"
      then obtain a Cs where ref:"e = ref(a,Cs)" by (cases r) auto
      with wte wf have "class":"is_class P (last Cs)" 
        by (auto intro:Subobj_last_isClass split:if_split_asm)
      show ?thesis
      proof(cases "P ⊢ (last Cs) ≼⇧* C")
        case True
        with "class" wf obtain Cs'  where "P ⊢ Path last Cs to C via Cs'"
          by(fastforce dest:leq_implies_path)
        with True ref show ?thesis by(fastforce intro:RedStaticUpCast)
      next
        case False
        have notleq:"¬ P ⊢ last Cs ≼⇧* C" by fact
        thus ?thesis
        proof(cases "C ∉ set Cs")
          case False
          then obtain Ds Ds' where "Cs = Ds@[C]@Ds'"
            by (auto simp:in_set_conv_decomp)
          with ref show ?thesis
            by(fastforce intro:RedStaticDownCast)
        next
          case True
          with ref notleq show ?thesis by (fastforce intro:RedStaticCastFail)
        qed
      qed
    next
      fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      thus ?thesis by(blast intro!:red_reds.StaticCastThrow)
    qed
  next
    assume nf: "¬ final e"
    from IH[OF hconf envconf De nf] show ?thesis by (blast intro:StaticCastRed)
  qed
next
  case WTrtVal thus ?case by(simp add:final_def)
next
  case WTrtVar thus ?case by(fastforce intro:RedVar simp:hyper_isin_def)
next
  case (WTrtBinOp E h e1 T1 e2 T2 bop T')
  have bop:"case bop of Eq ⇒ T' = Boolean
                      | Add ⇒ T1 = Integer ∧ T2 = Integer ∧ T' = Integer"
    and wte1:"P,E,h ⊢ e1 : T1" and wte2:"P,E,h ⊢ e2 : T2" by fact+
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e1"
    thus ?thesis
    proof (rule finalE)
      fix v1 assume e1 [simp]:"e1 = Val v1"
      show ?thesis
      proof cases
        assume "final e2"
        thus ?thesis
        proof (rule finalE)
          fix v2 assume e2 [simp]:"e2 = Val v2"
          show ?thesis
          proof (cases bop)
            assume "bop = Eq"
            thus ?thesis using WTrtBinOp by(fastforce intro:RedBinOp)
          next
            assume Add:"bop = Add"
            with e1 e2 wte1 wte2 bop obtain i1 i2 
              where "v1 = Intg i1" and "v2 = Intg i2"
              by (auto dest!:typeof_Integer)
            with Add obtain v where "binop(bop,v1,v2) = Some v" by simp
            with e1 e2 show ?thesis by (fastforce intro:RedBinOp)
          qed
        next
          fix a assume "e2 = Throw a"
          thus ?thesis by(auto intro:red_reds.BinOpThrow2)
        qed
      next
        assume "¬ final e2" with WTrtBinOp show ?thesis
          by simp (fast intro!:BinOpRed2)
      qed
    next
      fix r assume "e1 = Throw r"
      thus ?thesis by simp (fast intro:red_reds.BinOpThrow1)
    qed
  next
    assume "¬ final e1" with WTrtBinOp show ?thesis
      by simp (fast intro:BinOpRed1)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtLAss E h V T e T')
  have wte:"P,E,h ⊢ e : T'"
    and wtvar:"P,E,h ⊢ Var V : T"
    and sub:"P ⊢ T' ≤ T"
    and envconf:"P ⊢ E √" by fact+
  from envconf wtvar have type:"is_type P T" by(auto simp:envconf_def)
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume fin:"final e"
    from fin show ?case
    proof (rule finalE)
      fix v assume e:"e = Val v"
      from sub type wf show ?case
      proof(rule subE)
        assume eq:"T' = T" and "∀C. T' ≠ Class C"
        hence "P ⊢ T casts v to v"
          by simp(rule casts_prim)
        with wte wtvar eq e show ?thesis
          by(auto intro!:RedLAss)
      next
        fix C D
        assume T':"T' = Class C" and T:"T = Class D"
          and path_unique:"P ⊢ Path C to D unique"
        from wte e T' obtain a Cs where ref:"e = ref(a,Cs)"
          and last:"last Cs = C" 
          by (auto dest!:typeof_Class_Subo)
        from path_unique obtain Cs' where path_via:"P ⊢ Path C to D via Cs'"
          by(auto simp:path_unique_def path_via_def)
        with last have "P ⊢ Class D casts Ref(a,Cs) to Ref(a,Cs@⇩pCs')"
          by (fastforce intro:casts_ref simp:path_via_def)
        with wte wtvar T ref show ?thesis
          by(auto intro!:RedLAss)
      next
        fix C
        assume T':"T' = NT" and T:"T = Class C"
        with wte e have null:"e = null" by auto
        have "P ⊢ Class C casts Null to Null"
          by -(rule casts_null)
        with wte wtvar T null show ?thesis
          by(auto intro!:RedLAss)
      qed
    next
      fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      thus ?thesis by(fastforce intro:red_reds.LAssThrow)
    qed
  next
    assume "¬ final e" with WTrtLAss show ?thesis
      by simp (fast intro:LAssRed)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtFAcc E h e C Cs F T)
  have wte: "P,E,h ⊢ e : Class C" 
    and field: "P ⊢ C has least F:T via Cs"
    and notemptyCs:"Cs ≠ []"
    and hconf: "P ⊢ h √" by fact+
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e"
    with wte show ?thesis
    proof (rule final_refE)
      fix r assume e: "e = ref r"
      then obtain a Cs' where ref:"e = ref(a,Cs')" by (cases r) auto
      with wte obtain D S where h:"h a = Some(D,S)" and suboD:"Subobjs P D Cs'"
        and last:"last Cs' = C"
        by (fastforce split:if_split_asm)
      from field obtain Bs fs ms
        where "class": "class P (last Cs) = Some(Bs,fs,ms)"
        and fs:"map_of fs F = Some T"
        by (fastforce simp:LeastFieldDecl_def FieldDecls_def)
      obtain Ds where Ds:"Ds = Cs'@⇩pCs" by simp
      with notemptyCs "class" have class':"class P (last Ds) = Some(Bs,fs,ms)"
        by (drule_tac Cs'="Cs'" in appendPath_last) simp
      from field suboD last Ds wf have subo:"Subobjs P D Ds"
        by(fastforce intro:Subobjs_appendPath simp:LeastFieldDecl_def FieldDecls_def)
      with hconf h have "P,h ⊢ (D,S) √" by (auto simp:hconf_def)
      with class' subo obtain fs' where S:"(Ds,fs') ∈ S"
        and "P,h ⊢ fs' (:≤) map_of fs"
        apply (auto simp:oconf_def)
        apply (erule_tac x="Ds" in allE)
        apply auto
        apply (erule_tac x="Ds" in allE)
        apply (erule_tac x="fs'" in allE)
        apply auto
        done
      with fs obtain v where "fs' F = Some v"
        by (fastforce simp:fconf_def)
      with h last Ds S
      have "P,E ⊢ ⟨(ref (a,Cs'))∙F{Cs}, (h,l)⟩ → ⟨Val v,(h,l)⟩"
        by (fastforce intro:RedFAcc)
      with ref show ?thesis by blast
    next
      fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      thus ?thesis by(fastforce intro:red_reds.FAccThrow)
    qed
  next
    assume "¬ final e" with WTrtFAcc show ?thesis
      by(fastforce intro!:FAccRed)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtFAccNT E h e F Cs T)
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e"  ― ‹@{term e} is @{term null} or @{term throw}›
    with WTrtFAccNT show ?thesis
      by(fastforce simp:final_def intro: RedFAccNull red_reds.FAccThrow 
                  dest!:typeof_NT)
  next
    assume "¬ final e" ― ‹@{term e} reduces by IH›
    with WTrtFAccNT show ?thesis by simp (fast intro:FAccRed)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtFAss E h e⇩1 C Cs F T e⇩2 T')
  have wte1:"P,E,h ⊢ e⇩1 : Class C"
    and wte2:"P,E,h ⊢ e⇩2 : T'"
    and field:"P ⊢ C has least F:T via Cs" 
    and notemptyCs:"Cs ≠ []"
    and sub:"P ⊢ T' ≤ T"
    and hconf:"P ⊢ h √" by fact+
  from field wf have type:"is_type P T" by(rule least_field_is_type)
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e⇩1"
    with wte1 show ?thesis
    proof (rule final_refE)
      fix r assume e1: "e⇩1 = ref r"
      show ?thesis
      proof cases
        assume "final e⇩2"
        thus ?thesis
        proof (rule finalE)
          fix v assume e2:"e⇩2 = Val v"
          from e1 obtain a Cs' where ref:"e⇩1 = ref(a,Cs')" by (cases r) auto
          with wte1 obtain D S where h:"h a = Some(D,S)" 
            and suboD:"Subobjs P D Cs'" and last:"last Cs' = C"
            by (fastforce split:if_split_asm)
          from field obtain Bs fs ms
            where "class": "class P (last Cs) = Some(Bs,fs,ms)"
            and fs:"map_of fs F = Some T"
            by (fastforce simp:LeastFieldDecl_def FieldDecls_def)
          obtain Ds where Ds:"Ds = Cs'@⇩pCs" by simp
          with notemptyCs "class" have class':"class P (last Ds) = Some(Bs,fs,ms)"
            by (drule_tac Cs'="Cs'" in appendPath_last) simp
          from field suboD last Ds wf have subo:"Subobjs P D Ds"
            by(fastforce intro:Subobjs_appendPath 
              simp:LeastFieldDecl_def FieldDecls_def)
          with hconf h have "P,h ⊢ (D,S) √" by (auto simp:hconf_def)
          with class' subo obtain fs' where S:"(Ds,fs') ∈ S"
            by (auto simp:oconf_def)
          from sub type wf show ?thesis
          proof(rule subE)
            assume eq:"T' = T" and "∀C. T' ≠ Class C"
            hence "P ⊢ T casts v to v"
              by simp(rule casts_prim)
            with h last field Ds notemptyCs S eq
            have "P,E ⊢ ⟨(ref (a,Cs'))∙F{Cs}:=(Val v), (h,l)⟩ → 
              ⟨Val v, (h(a ↦ (D,insert (Ds,fs'(F↦v)) (S -  {(Ds,fs')}))),l)⟩"
              by (fastforce intro:RedFAss)
            with ref e2 show ?thesis by blast
          next
            fix C' D'
            assume T':"T' = Class C'" and T:"T = Class D'"
            and path_unique:"P ⊢ Path C' to D' unique"
            from wte2 e2 T' obtain a' Cs'' where ref2:"e⇩2 = ref(a',Cs'')"
              and last':"last Cs'' = C'"
              by (auto dest!:typeof_Class_Subo)
            from path_unique obtain Ds' where "P ⊢ Path C' to D' via Ds'"
              by(auto simp:path_via_def path_unique_def)
            with last' 
            have casts:"P ⊢ Class D' casts Ref(a',Cs'') to Ref(a',Cs''@⇩pDs')"
              by (fastforce intro:casts_ref simp:path_via_def)
            obtain v' where "v' = Ref(a',Cs''@⇩pDs')" by simp
            with h last field Ds notemptyCs S ref e2 ref2 T casts
            have "P,E ⊢ ⟨(ref (a,Cs'))∙F{Cs}:=(Val v), (h,l)⟩ → 
                        ⟨Val v',(h(a ↦ (D,insert (Ds,fs'(F↦v'))(S-{(Ds,fs')}))),l)⟩"
              by (fastforce intro:RedFAss)
            with ref e2 show ?thesis by blast
          next
            fix C'
            assume T':"T' = NT" and T:"T = Class C'"
            from e2 wte2 T' have null:"e⇩2 = null" by auto
            have casts:"P ⊢ Class C' casts Null to Null"
              by -(rule casts_null)
            obtain v' where "v' = Null" by simp
            with h last field Ds notemptyCs S ref e2 null T casts
            have "P,E ⊢ ⟨(ref (a,Cs'))∙F{Cs}:=(Val v), (h,l)⟩ → 
                  ⟨Val v', (h(a ↦ (D,insert (Ds,fs'(F↦v')) (S -  {(Ds,fs')}))),l)⟩"
              by (fastforce intro:RedFAss)
            with ref e2 show ?thesis by blast
          qed
        next
          fix r assume "e⇩2 = Throw r"
          thus ?thesis using e1 by(fastforce intro:red_reds.FAssThrow2)
        qed
      next
        assume "¬ final e⇩2" with WTrtFAss e1 show ?thesis
          by simp (fast intro!:FAssRed2)
      qed
    next
      fix r assume "e⇩1 = Throw r"
      thus ?thesis by(fastforce intro:red_reds.FAssThrow1)
    qed
  next
    assume "¬ final e⇩1" with WTrtFAss show ?thesis
      by simp (blast intro!:FAssRed1)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtFAssNT E h e⇩1 e⇩2 T' T F Cs)
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume e1: "final e⇩1"  ― ‹@{term e⇩1} is @{term null} or @{term throw}›
    show ?thesis
    proof cases
      assume "final e⇩2"  ― ‹@{term e⇩2} is @{term Val} or @{term throw}›
      with WTrtFAssNT e1 show ?thesis
        by(fastforce simp:final_def intro:RedFAssNull red_reds.FAssThrow1 
                                         red_reds.FAssThrow2 dest!:typeof_NT)
    next
      assume  "¬ final e⇩2" ― ‹@{term e⇩2} reduces by IH›
      with WTrtFAssNT e1 show ?thesis
        by (fastforce simp:final_def intro!:red_reds.FAssRed2 red_reds.FAssThrow1)
    qed
  next
    assume "¬ final e⇩1" ― ‹@{term e⇩1} reduces by IH›
    with WTrtFAssNT show ?thesis by (fastforce intro:FAssRed1)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtCall E h e C M Ts T pns body Cs es Ts')
  have wte: "P,E,h ⊢ e : Class C"
    and "method":"P ⊢ C has least M = (Ts, T, pns, body) via Cs"
    and wtes: "P,E,h ⊢ es [:] Ts'"and sub: "P ⊢ Ts' [≤] Ts"
    and IHes: "⋀l. ⟦P ⊢ h √; P ⊢ E √; 𝒟s es ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ finals es⟧
             ⟹ ∃es' s'. P,E ⊢ ⟨es,(h,l)⟩ [→] ⟨es',s'⟩"
    and hconf: "P ⊢ h √" and envconf:"P ⊢ E √" 
    and D: "𝒟 (e∙M(es)) ⌊dom l⌋" by fact+
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume final:"final e"
    with wte show ?thesis
    proof (rule final_refE)
      fix r assume ref: "e = ref r"
      show ?thesis
      proof cases
        assume es: "∃vs. es = map Val vs"
        from ref obtain a Cs' where ref:"e = ref(a,Cs')" by (cases r) auto
        with wte obtain D S where h:"h a = Some(D,S)" and suboD:"Subobjs P D Cs'"
          and last:"last Cs' = C"
          by (fastforce split:if_split_asm)
        from wte ref h have subcls:"P ⊢ D ≼⇧* C" by -(drule mdc_leq_dyn_type,auto)
        from "method" have has:"P ⊢ C has M = (Ts,T,pns,body) via Cs"
            by(rule has_least_method_has_method)
        from es obtain vs where vs:"es = map Val vs" by auto
        obtain Cs'' Ts'' T' pns' body' where 
          ass:"P ⊢ (D,Cs'@⇩pCs) selects M = (Ts'',T',pns',body') via Cs'' ∧
           length Ts'' = length pns' ∧ length vs = length pns' ∧ P ⊢ T' ≤ T"
        proof (cases "∃Ts'' T' pns' body' Ds. P ⊢ D has least M = (Ts'',T',pns',body') via Ds")
          case True
          then obtain Ts'' T' pns' body' Cs'' 
            where least:"P ⊢ D has least M = (Ts'',T',pns',body') via Cs''"
            by auto
          hence select:"P ⊢ (D,Cs'@⇩pCs) selects M = (Ts'',T',pns',body') via Cs''"
            by(rule dyn_unique)
          from subcls least wf has have "Ts = Ts''" and leq:"P ⊢ T' ≤ T"
            by -(drule leq_method_subtypes,simp_all,blast)+
          hence "length Ts = length Ts''" by (simp add:list_all2_iff)
          with sub have "length Ts' = length Ts''" by (simp add:list_all2_iff)
          with WTrts_same_length[OF wtes] vs have length:"length vs = length Ts''"
            by simp
          from has_least_wf_mdecl[OF wf least] 
          have lengthParams:"length Ts'' = length pns'" by (simp add:wf_mdecl_def)
          with length have "length vs = length pns'" by simp
          with select lengthParams leq show ?thesis using that by blast
        next
          case False
          hence non_dyn:"∀Ts'' T' pns' body' Ds. 
              ¬ P ⊢ D has least M = (Ts'',T',pns',body') via Ds" by auto
          from suboD last have path:"P ⊢ Path D to C via Cs'" 
            by(simp add:path_via_def)
          from "method" have notempty:"Cs ≠ []" 
            by(fastforce intro!:Subobjs_nonempty 
                        simp:LeastMethodDef_def MethodDefs_def)
          from suboD have "class": "is_class P D" by(rule Subobjs_isClass)
          from suboD last have path:"P ⊢ Path D to C via Cs'"
            by(simp add:path_via_def)
          with "method" wf have "P ⊢ D has M = (Ts,T,pns,body) via Cs'@⇩pCs"
            by(auto intro:has_path_has has_least_method_has_method)
          with "class" wf obtain Cs'' Ts'' T' pns' body' where overrider:
            "P ⊢ (D,Cs'@⇩pCs) has overrider M = (Ts'',T',pns',body') via Cs''"
            by(auto dest!:class_wf simp:is_class_def wf_cdecl_def,blast)
          with non_dyn
          have select:"P ⊢ (D,Cs'@⇩pCs) selects M = (Ts'',T',pns',body') via Cs''"
            by-(rule dyn_ambiguous,simp_all)
          from notempty have eq:"(Cs' @⇩p Cs) @⇩p [last Cs] = (Cs' @⇩p Cs)"
            by(rule appendPath_append_last)
          from "method" wf
          have "P ⊢ last Cs has least M = (Ts,T,pns,body) via [last Cs]"
            by(auto dest:Subobj_last_isClass intro:Subobjs_Base subobjs_rel
                    simp:LeastMethodDef_def MethodDefs_def)
          with notempty
          have "P ⊢ last(Cs'@⇩pCs) has least M = (Ts,T,pns,body) via [last Cs]"
            by -(drule_tac Cs'="Cs'" in appendPath_last,simp)
          with overrider wf eq
          have "(Cs'',(Ts'',T',pns',body')) ∈ MinimalMethodDefs P D M"
            and "P,D ⊢ Cs'' ⊑ Cs'@⇩pCs"
            by(auto simp:FinalOverriderMethodDef_def OverriderMethodDefs_def)
              (drule wf_sees_method_fun,auto)
          with subcls wf notempty has path have "Ts = Ts''" and leq:"P ⊢ T' ≤ T"
            by -(drule leq_methods_subtypes,simp_all,blast)+
          hence "length Ts = length Ts''" by (simp add:list_all2_iff)
          with sub have "length Ts' = length Ts''" by (simp add:list_all2_iff)
          with WTrts_same_length[OF wtes] vs have length:"length vs = length Ts''"
            by simp
          from select_method_wf_mdecl[OF wf select]
          have lengthParams:"length Ts'' = length pns'" by (simp add:wf_mdecl_def)
          with length have "length vs = length pns'" by simp
          with select lengthParams leq show ?thesis using that by blast
        qed
        obtain new_body where "case T of Class D ⇒ 
           new_body = ⦇D⦈blocks(this#pns',Class(last Cs'')#Ts'',Ref(a,Cs'')#vs,body')
    | _ ⇒ new_body = blocks(this#pns',Class(last Cs'')#Ts'',Ref(a,Cs'')#vs,body')"
          by(cases T) auto
        with h "method" last ass ref vs
          show ?thesis by (auto intro!:exI RedCall)
      next
        assume "¬(∃vs. es = map Val vs)"
        hence not_all_Val: "¬(∀e ∈ set es. ∃v. e = Val v)"
          by(simp add:ex_map_conv)
        let ?ves = "takeWhile (λe. ∃v. e = Val v) es"
        let ?rest = "dropWhile (λe. ∃v. e = Val v) es"
        let ?ex = "hd ?rest" let ?rst = "tl ?rest"
        from not_all_Val have nonempty: "?rest ≠ []" by auto
        hence es: "es = ?ves @ ?ex # ?rst" by simp
        have "∀e ∈ set ?ves. ∃v. e = Val v" by(fastforce dest:set_takeWhileD)
        then obtain vs where ves: "?ves = map Val vs"
          using ex_map_conv by blast
        show ?thesis
        proof cases
          assume "final ?ex"
          moreover from nonempty have "¬(∃v. ?ex = Val v)"
            by(auto simp:neq_Nil_conv simp del:dropWhile_eq_Nil_conv)
              (simp add:dropWhile_eq_Cons_conv)
          ultimately obtain r' where ex_Throw: "?ex = Throw r'"
            by(fast elim!:finalE)
          show ?thesis using ref es ex_Throw ves
            by(fastforce intro:red_reds.CallThrowParams)
        next
          assume not_fin: "¬ final ?ex"
          have "finals es = finals(?ves @ ?ex # ?rst)" using es
            by(rule arg_cong)
          also have "… = finals(?ex # ?rst)" using ves by simp
          finally have "finals es = finals(?ex # ?rst)" .
          hence "¬ finals es" using not_finals_ConsI[OF not_fin] by blast
          thus ?thesis using ref D IHes[OF hconf envconf]
            by(fastforce intro!:CallParams)
        qed
      qed
    next
      fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      with WTrtCall.prems show ?thesis by(fast intro!:red_reds.CallThrowObj)
    qed
  next
    assume "¬ final e"
    with WTrtCall show ?thesis by simp (blast intro!:CallObj)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtStaticCall E h e C' C M Ts T pns body Cs es Ts')
  have wte: "P,E,h ⊢ e : Class C'"
    and path_unique:"P ⊢ Path C' to C unique"
    and "method":"P ⊢ C has least M = (Ts, T, pns, body) via Cs"
    and wtes: "P,E,h ⊢ es [:] Ts'"and sub: "P ⊢ Ts' [≤] Ts"
    and IHes: "⋀l.
              ⟦P ⊢ h √; envconf P E; 𝒟s es ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ finals es⟧
              ⟹ ∃es' s'. P,E ⊢ ⟨es,(h,l)⟩ [→] ⟨es',s'⟩"
    and hconf: "P ⊢ h √" and envconf:"envconf P E"
    and D: "𝒟 (e∙(C::)M(es)) ⌊dom l⌋" by fact+
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume final:"final e"
    with wte show ?thesis
    proof (rule final_refE)
      fix r assume ref: "e = ref r"
      show ?thesis
      proof cases
        assume es: "∃vs. es = map Val vs"
        from ref obtain a Cs' where ref:"e = ref(a,Cs')" by (cases r) auto
        with wte have last:"last Cs' = C'"
          by (fastforce split:if_split_asm)
        with path_unique obtain Cs''
          where path_via:"P ⊢ Path (last Cs') to C via Cs''"
          by (auto simp add:path_via_def path_unique_def)
        obtain Ds where Ds:"Ds = (Cs'@⇩pCs'')@⇩pCs" by simp
        from es obtain vs where vs:"es = map Val vs" by auto
        from sub have "length Ts' = length Ts" by (simp add:list_all2_iff)
        with WTrts_same_length[OF wtes] vs have length:"length vs = length Ts"
          by simp
        from has_least_wf_mdecl[OF wf "method"]
        have lengthParams:"length Ts = length pns" by (simp add:wf_mdecl_def)
        with "method" last path_unique path_via Ds length ref vs show ?thesis
          by (auto intro!:exI RedStaticCall)
      next
        assume "¬(∃vs. es = map Val vs)"
        hence not_all_Val: "¬(∀e ∈ set es. ∃v. e = Val v)"
          by(simp add:ex_map_conv)
        let ?ves = "takeWhile (λe. ∃v. e = Val v) es"
        let ?rest = "dropWhile (λe. ∃v. e = Val v) es"
        let ?ex = "hd ?rest" let ?rst = "tl ?rest"
        from not_all_Val have nonempty: "?rest ≠ []" by auto
        hence es: "es = ?ves @ ?ex # ?rst" by simp
        have "∀e ∈ set ?ves. ∃v. e = Val v" by(fastforce dest:set_takeWhileD)
        then obtain vs where ves: "?ves = map Val vs"
          using ex_map_conv by blast
        show ?thesis
        proof cases
          assume "final ?ex"
          moreover from nonempty have "¬(∃v. ?ex = Val v)"
            by(auto simp:neq_Nil_conv simp del:dropWhile_eq_Nil_conv)
              (simp add:dropWhile_eq_Cons_conv)
          ultimately obtain r' where ex_Throw: "?ex = Throw r'"
            by(fast elim!:finalE)
          show ?thesis using ref es ex_Throw ves
            by(fastforce intro:red_reds.CallThrowParams)
        next
          assume not_fin: "¬ final ?ex"
          have "finals es = finals(?ves @ ?ex # ?rst)" using es
            by(rule arg_cong)
          also have "… = finals(?ex # ?rst)" using ves by simp
          finally have "finals es = finals(?ex # ?rst)" .
          hence "¬ finals es" using not_finals_ConsI[OF not_fin] by blast
          thus ?thesis using ref D IHes[OF hconf envconf]
            by(fastforce intro!:CallParams)
        qed
      qed
    next
      fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      with WTrtStaticCall.prems show ?thesis by(fast intro!:red_reds.CallThrowObj)
    qed
  next
    assume "¬ final e"
    with WTrtStaticCall show ?thesis by simp (blast intro!:CallObj)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtCallNT E h e es Ts Copt M T)
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e"
    moreover
    { fix v assume e: "e = Val v"
      hence "e = null" using WTrtCallNT by simp
      have ?case
      proof cases
        assume "finals es"
        moreover
        { fix vs assume "es = map Val vs"
          with WTrtCallNT e have ?thesis by(fastforce intro: RedCallNull dest!:typeof_NT) }
        moreover
        { fix vs a es' assume "es = map Val vs @ Throw a # es'"
          with WTrtCallNT e have ?thesis by(fastforce intro: CallThrowParams) }
        ultimately show ?thesis by(fastforce simp:finals_def)
      next
        assume "¬ finals es" ― ‹@{term es} reduces by IH›
        with WTrtCallNT e show ?thesis by(fastforce intro: CallParams)
      qed
    }
    moreover
    { fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      with WTrtCallNT have ?case by(fastforce intro: CallThrowObj) }
    ultimately show ?thesis by(fastforce simp:final_def)
  next
    assume "¬ final e" ― ‹@{term e} reduces by IH›
    with WTrtCallNT show ?thesis by (fastforce intro:CallObj)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtInitBlock h v T' E V T e⇩2 T⇩2)
  have IH2: "⋀l. ⟦P ⊢ h √; P ⊢ E(V ↦ T) √; 𝒟 e⇩2 ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ final e⇩2⟧
                  ⟹ ∃e' s'. P,E(V ↦ T) ⊢ ⟨e⇩2,(h,l)⟩ → ⟨e',s'⟩"
    and typeof:"P ⊢ typeof⇘h⇙ v = Some T'"
    and type:"is_type P T" and sub:"P ⊢ T' ≤ T"
    and hconf: "P ⊢ h √" and envconf:"P ⊢ E √"
    and D: "𝒟 {V:T := Val v; e⇩2} ⌊dom l⌋" by fact+
  from wf typeof type sub obtain v' where casts:"P ⊢ T casts v to v'"
    by(auto dest:sub_casts)
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume fin:"final e⇩2"
    with casts show ?thesis
      by(fastforce elim:finalE intro:RedInitBlock red_reds.InitBlockThrow)
  next
    assume not_fin2: "¬ final e⇩2"
    from D have D2: "𝒟 e⇩2 ⌊dom(l(V↦v'))⌋" by (auto simp:hyperset_defs)
    from envconf type have "P ⊢ E(V ↦ T) √" by(auto simp:envconf_def)
    from IH2[OF hconf this D2 not_fin2]
    obtain h' l' e' where red2: "P,E(V ↦ T) ⊢ ⟨e⇩2,(h, l(V↦v'))⟩ → ⟨e',(h', l')⟩"
      by auto
    from red_lcl_incr[OF red2] have "V ∈ dom l'" by auto
    with red2 casts show ?thesis by(fastforce intro:InitBlockRed)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtBlock E V T h e T')
  have IH: "⋀l. ⟦P ⊢ h √; P ⊢ E(V ↦ T) √; 𝒟 e ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ final e⟧
                 ⟹ ∃e' s'. P,E(V ↦ T) ⊢ ⟨e,(h,l)⟩ → ⟨e',s'⟩"
   and unass: "¬ assigned V e" and type:"is_type P T"
   and hconf: "P ⊢ h √" and envconf:"P ⊢ E √" 
    and D: "𝒟 {V:T; e} ⌊dom l⌋" by fact+
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e"
    thus ?thesis
    proof (rule finalE)
      fix v assume "e = Val v" with type show ?thesis by(fast intro:RedBlock)
    next
      fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      with type show ?thesis by(fast intro:red_reds.BlockThrow)
    qed
  next
    assume not_fin: "¬ final e"
    from D have De: "𝒟 e ⌊dom(l(V:=None))⌋" by(simp add:hyperset_defs)
    from envconf type have "P ⊢ E(V ↦ T) √" by(auto simp:envconf_def)
    from IH[OF hconf this De not_fin]
    obtain h' l' e' where red: "P,E(V ↦ T) ⊢ ⟨e,(h,l(V:=None))⟩ → ⟨e',(h',l')⟩"
      by auto
    show ?thesis
    proof (cases "l' V")
      assume "l' V = None"
      with red unass show ?thesis by(blast intro: BlockRedNone)
    next
      fix v assume "l' V = Some v"
      with red unass type show ?thesis by(blast intro: BlockRedSome)
    qed
  qed
next
  case (WTrtSeq E h e⇩1 T⇩1 e⇩2 T⇩2)
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e⇩1"
    thus ?thesis
      by(fast elim:finalE intro:intro:RedSeq red_reds.SeqThrow)
  next
    assume "¬ final e⇩1" with WTrtSeq show ?thesis
      by simp (blast intro:SeqRed)
  qed
next
  case (WTrtCond E h e e⇩1 T e⇩2)
  have wt: "P,E,h ⊢ e : Boolean" by fact
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e"
    thus ?thesis
    proof (rule finalE)
      fix v assume val: "e = Val v"
      then obtain b where v: "v = Bool b" using wt by (fastforce dest:typeof_Boolean)
      show ?thesis
      proof (cases b)
        case True with val v show ?thesis by(auto intro:RedCondT)
      next
        case False with val v show ?thesis by(auto intro:RedCondF)
      qed
    next
      fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      thus ?thesis by(fast intro:red_reds.CondThrow)
    qed
  next
    assume "¬ final e" with WTrtCond show ?thesis
      by simp (fast intro:CondRed)
  qed
next
  case WTrtWhile show ?case by(fast intro:RedWhile)
next
  case (WTrtThrow E h e T' T)
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e" ― ‹Then @{term e} must be @{term throw} or @{term null}›
    with WTrtThrow show ?thesis
      by(fastforce simp:final_def is_refT_def
                  intro:red_reds.ThrowThrow red_reds.RedThrowNull
                  dest!:typeof_NT typeof_Class_Subo)
  next
    assume "¬ final e" ― ‹Then @{term e} must reduce›
    with WTrtThrow show ?thesis by simp (blast intro:ThrowRed)
  qed
next
  case WTrtNil thus ?case by simp
next
  case (WTrtCons E h e T es Ts)
  have IHe: "⋀l. ⟦P ⊢ h √; P ⊢ E √; 𝒟 e ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ final e⟧
                ⟹ ∃e' s'. P,E ⊢ ⟨e,(h,l)⟩ → ⟨e',s'⟩"
   and IHes: "⋀l. ⟦P ⊢ h √; P ⊢ E √; 𝒟s es ⌊dom l⌋; ¬ finals es⟧
             ⟹ ∃es' s'. P,E ⊢ ⟨es,(h,l)⟩ [→] ⟨es',s'⟩"
   and hconf: "P ⊢ h √" and envconf:"P ⊢ E √"
    and D: "𝒟s (e#es) ⌊dom l⌋"
   and not_fins: "¬ finals(e # es)" by fact+
  have De: "𝒟 e ⌊dom l⌋" and Des: "𝒟s es (⌊dom l⌋ ⊔ 𝒜 e)"
    using D by auto
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "final e"
    thus ?thesis
    proof (rule finalE)
      fix v assume e: "e = Val v"
      hence Des': "𝒟s es ⌊dom l⌋" using De Des by auto
      have not_fins_tl: "¬ finals es" using not_fins e by simp
      show ?thesis using e IHes[OF hconf envconf Des' not_fins_tl]
        by (blast intro!:ListRed2)
    next
      fix r assume "e = Throw r"
      hence False using not_fins by simp
      thus ?thesis ..
    qed
  next
    assume "¬ final e"
    from IHe[OF hconf envconf De this] show ?thesis by(fast intro!:ListRed1)
  qed
qed


end