section ‹The type of strict products›
theory Sprod
imports Cfun
begin
default_sort pcpo
subsection ‹Definition of strict product type›
definition "sprod = {p::'a × 'b. p = ⊥ ∨ (fst p ≠ ⊥ ∧ snd p ≠ ⊥)}"
pcpodef ('a, 'b) sprod ("(_ ⊗/ _)" [21,20] 20) = "sprod :: ('a × 'b) set"
unfolding sprod_def by simp_all
instance sprod :: ("{chfin,pcpo}", "{chfin,pcpo}") chfin
by (rule typedef_chfin [OF type_definition_sprod below_sprod_def])
type_notation (ASCII)
sprod (infixr "**" 20)
subsection ‹Definitions of constants›
definition
sfst :: "('a ** 'b) → 'a" where
"sfst = (Λ p. fst (Rep_sprod p))"
definition
ssnd :: "('a ** 'b) → 'b" where
"ssnd = (Λ p. snd (Rep_sprod p))"
definition
spair :: "'a → 'b → ('a ** 'b)" where
"spair = (Λ a b. Abs_sprod (seq⋅b⋅a, seq⋅a⋅b))"
definition
ssplit :: "('a → 'b → 'c) → ('a ** 'b) → 'c" where
"ssplit = (Λ f p. seq⋅p⋅(f⋅(sfst⋅p)⋅(ssnd⋅p)))"
syntax
"_stuple" :: "[logic, args] ⇒ logic" ("(1'(:_,/ _:'))")
translations
"(:x, y, z:)" == "(:x, (:y, z:):)"
"(:x, y:)" == "CONST spair⋅x⋅y"
translations
"Λ(CONST spair⋅x⋅y). t" == "CONST ssplit⋅(Λ x y. t)"
subsection ‹Case analysis›
lemma spair_sprod: "(seq⋅b⋅a, seq⋅a⋅b) ∈ sprod"
by (simp add: sprod_def seq_conv_if)
lemma Rep_sprod_spair: "Rep_sprod (:a, b:) = (seq⋅b⋅a, seq⋅a⋅b)"
by (simp add: spair_def cont_Abs_sprod Abs_sprod_inverse spair_sprod)
lemmas Rep_sprod_simps =
Rep_sprod_inject [symmetric] below_sprod_def
prod_eq_iff below_prod_def
Rep_sprod_strict Rep_sprod_spair
lemma sprodE [case_names bottom spair, cases type: sprod]:
obtains "p = ⊥" | x y where "p = (:x, y:)" and "x ≠ ⊥" and "y ≠ ⊥"
using Rep_sprod [of p] by (auto simp add: sprod_def Rep_sprod_simps)
lemma sprod_induct [case_names bottom spair, induct type: sprod]:
"⟦P ⊥; ⋀x y. ⟦x ≠ ⊥; y ≠ ⊥⟧ ⟹ P (:x, y:)⟧ ⟹ P x"
by (cases x, simp_all)
subsection ‹Properties of \emph{spair}›
lemma spair_strict1 [simp]: "(:⊥, y:) = ⊥"
by (simp add: Rep_sprod_simps)
lemma spair_strict2 [simp]: "(:x, ⊥:) = ⊥"
by (simp add: Rep_sprod_simps)
lemma spair_bottom_iff [simp]: "((:x, y:) = ⊥) = (x = ⊥ ∨ y = ⊥)"
by (simp add: Rep_sprod_simps seq_conv_if)
lemma spair_below_iff:
"((:a, b:) ⊑ (:c, d:)) = (a = ⊥ ∨ b = ⊥ ∨ (a ⊑ c ∧ b ⊑ d))"
by (simp add: Rep_sprod_simps seq_conv_if)
lemma spair_eq_iff:
"((:a, b:) = (:c, d:)) =
(a = c ∧ b = d ∨ (a = ⊥ ∨ b = ⊥) ∧ (c = ⊥ ∨ d = ⊥))"
by (simp add: Rep_sprod_simps seq_conv_if)
lemma spair_strict: "x = ⊥ ∨ y = ⊥ ⟹ (:x, y:) = ⊥"
by simp
lemma spair_strict_rev: "(:x, y:) ≠ ⊥ ⟹ x ≠ ⊥ ∧ y ≠ ⊥"
by simp
lemma spair_defined: "⟦x ≠ ⊥; y ≠ ⊥⟧ ⟹ (:x, y:) ≠ ⊥"
by simp
lemma spair_defined_rev: "(:x, y:) = ⊥ ⟹ x = ⊥ ∨ y = ⊥"
by simp
lemma spair_below:
"⟦x ≠ ⊥; y ≠ ⊥⟧ ⟹ (:x, y:) ⊑ (:a, b:) = (x ⊑ a ∧ y ⊑ b)"
by (simp add: spair_below_iff)
lemma spair_eq:
"⟦x ≠ ⊥; y ≠ ⊥⟧ ⟹ ((:x, y:) = (:a, b:)) = (x = a ∧ y = b)"
by (simp add: spair_eq_iff)
lemma spair_inject:
"⟦x ≠ ⊥; y ≠ ⊥; (:x, y:) = (:a, b:)⟧ ⟹ x = a ∧ y = b"
by (rule spair_eq [THEN iffD1])
lemma inst_sprod_pcpo2: "⊥ = (:⊥, ⊥:)"
by simp
lemma sprodE2: "(⋀x y. p = (:x, y:) ⟹ Q) ⟹ Q"
by (cases p, simp only: inst_sprod_pcpo2, simp)
subsection ‹Properties of \emph{sfst} and \emph{ssnd}›
lemma sfst_strict [simp]: "sfst⋅⊥ = ⊥"
by (simp add: sfst_def cont_Rep_sprod Rep_sprod_strict)
lemma ssnd_strict [simp]: "ssnd⋅⊥ = ⊥"
by (simp add: ssnd_def cont_Rep_sprod Rep_sprod_strict)
lemma sfst_spair [simp]: "y ≠ ⊥ ⟹ sfst⋅(:x, y:) = x"
by (simp add: sfst_def cont_Rep_sprod Rep_sprod_spair)
lemma ssnd_spair [simp]: "x ≠ ⊥ ⟹ ssnd⋅(:x, y:) = y"
by (simp add: ssnd_def cont_Rep_sprod Rep_sprod_spair)
lemma sfst_bottom_iff [simp]: "(sfst⋅p = ⊥) = (p = ⊥)"
by (cases p, simp_all)
lemma ssnd_bottom_iff [simp]: "(ssnd⋅p = ⊥) = (p = ⊥)"
by (cases p, simp_all)
lemma sfst_defined: "p ≠ ⊥ ⟹ sfst⋅p ≠ ⊥"
by simp
lemma ssnd_defined: "p ≠ ⊥ ⟹ ssnd⋅p ≠ ⊥"
by simp
lemma spair_sfst_ssnd: "(:sfst⋅p, ssnd⋅p:) = p"
by (cases p, simp_all)
lemma below_sprod: "(x ⊑ y) = (sfst⋅x ⊑ sfst⋅y ∧ ssnd⋅x ⊑ ssnd⋅y)"
by (simp add: Rep_sprod_simps sfst_def ssnd_def cont_Rep_sprod)
lemma eq_sprod: "(x = y) = (sfst⋅x = sfst⋅y ∧ ssnd⋅x = ssnd⋅y)"
by (auto simp add: po_eq_conv below_sprod)
lemma sfst_below_iff: "sfst⋅x ⊑ y ⟷ x ⊑ (:y, ssnd⋅x:)"
apply (cases "x = ⊥", simp, cases "y = ⊥", simp)
apply (simp add: below_sprod)
done
lemma ssnd_below_iff: "ssnd⋅x ⊑ y ⟷ x ⊑ (:sfst⋅x, y:)"
apply (cases "x = ⊥", simp, cases "y = ⊥", simp)
apply (simp add: below_sprod)
done
subsection ‹Compactness›
lemma compact_sfst: "compact x ⟹ compact (sfst⋅x)"
by (rule compactI, simp add: sfst_below_iff)
lemma compact_ssnd: "compact x ⟹ compact (ssnd⋅x)"
by (rule compactI, simp add: ssnd_below_iff)
lemma compact_spair: "⟦compact x; compact y⟧ ⟹ compact (:x, y:)"
by (rule compact_sprod, simp add: Rep_sprod_spair seq_conv_if)
lemma compact_spair_iff:
"compact (:x, y:) = (x = ⊥ ∨ y = ⊥ ∨ (compact x ∧ compact y))"
apply (safe elim!: compact_spair)
apply (drule compact_sfst, simp)
apply (drule compact_ssnd, simp)
apply simp
apply simp
done
subsection ‹Properties of \emph{ssplit}›
lemma ssplit1 [simp]: "ssplit⋅f⋅⊥ = ⊥"
by (simp add: ssplit_def)
lemma ssplit2 [simp]: "⟦x ≠ ⊥; y ≠ ⊥⟧ ⟹ ssplit⋅f⋅(:x, y:) = f⋅x⋅y"
by (simp add: ssplit_def)
lemma ssplit3 [simp]: "ssplit⋅spair⋅z = z"
by (cases z, simp_all)
subsection ‹Strict product preserves flatness›
instance sprod :: (flat, flat) flat
proof
fix x y :: "'a ⊗ 'b"
assume "x ⊑ y" thus "x = ⊥ ∨ x = y"
apply (induct x, simp)
apply (induct y, simp)
apply (simp add: spair_below_iff flat_below_iff)
done
qed
end