Theory HOL-Algebra.SndIsomorphismGrp

(*  Title:      The Second Isomorphism Theorem for Groups
    Author:     Jakob von Raumer, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
    Maintainer: Jakob von Raumer <jakob.raumer@student.kit.edu>
*)

theory SndIsomorphismGrp
imports Coset
begin

section ‹The Second Isomorphism Theorem for Groups›

text ‹This theory provides a proof of the second isomorphism theorems for groups. 
The theorems consist of several facts about normal subgroups.›

text ‹The first lemma states that whenever we have a subgroup @{term S} and
a normal subgroup @{term H} of a group @{term G}, their intersection is normal
in @{term G}›

locale second_isomorphism_grp = normal +
  fixes S:: "'a set"
  assumes subgrpS: "subgroup S G"

context second_isomorphism_grp
begin

interpretation groupS: group "G⦇carrier := S⦈"
  using subgrpS 
  by (metis subgroup_imp_group)

lemma normal_subgrp_intersection_normal:
  shows "S ∩ H ⊲ (G⦇carrier := S⦈)"
proof(auto simp: groupS.normal_inv_iff)
  from subgrpS is_subgroup have "⋀x. x ∈ {S, H} ⟹ subgroup x G" by auto
  hence "subgroup (⋂ {S, H}) G" using subgroups_Inter by blast
  hence "subgroup (S ∩ H) G" by auto
  moreover have "S ∩ H ⊆ S" by simp
  ultimately show "subgroup (S ∩ H) (G⦇carrier := S⦈)"
    by (simp add: subgroup_incl subgrpS)
next
  fix g h
  assume g: "g ∈ S" and hH: "h ∈ H" and hS: "h ∈ S" 
  from g hH subgrpS show "g ⊗ h ⊗ inv⇘G⦇carrier := S⦈⇙ g ∈ H" 
    by (metis inv_op_closed2 subgroup.mem_carrier m_inv_consistent)
  from g hS subgrpS show "g ⊗ h ⊗ inv⇘G⦇carrier := S⦈⇙ g ∈ S" 
    by (metis subgroup.m_closed subgroup.m_inv_closed m_inv_consistent)
qed

lemma normal_set_mult_subgroup:
  shows "subgroup (H <#> S) G"
proof(rule subgroupI)
  show "H <#> S ⊆ carrier G" 
    by (metis setmult_subset_G subgroup.subset subgrpS subset)
next
  have "𝟭 ∈ H" "𝟭 ∈ S" 
    using is_subgroup subgrpS subgroup.one_closed by auto
  hence "𝟭 ⊗ 𝟭 ∈ H <#> S" 
    unfolding set_mult_def by blast
  thus "H <#> S ≠ {}" by auto
next
  fix g
  assume g: "g ∈ H <#> S"
  then obtain h s where h: "h ∈ H" and s: "s ∈ S" and ghs: "g = h ⊗ s" unfolding set_mult_def 
    by auto
  hence "s ∈ carrier G" by (metis subgroup.mem_carrier subgrpS)
  with h ghs obtain h' where h': "h' ∈ H" and "g = s ⊗ h'" 
    using coset_eq unfolding r_coset_def l_coset_def by auto
  with s have "inv g = (inv h') ⊗ (inv s)" 
    by (metis inv_mult_group mem_carrier subgroup.mem_carrier subgrpS)
  moreover from h' s subgrpS have "inv h' ∈ H" "inv s ∈ S" 
    using subgroup.m_inv_closed m_inv_closed by auto
  ultimately show "inv g ∈ H <#> S" 
    unfolding set_mult_def by auto
next
  fix g g'
  assume g: "g ∈ H <#> S" and h: "g' ∈ H <#> S"
  then obtain h h' s s' where hh'ss': "h ∈ H" "h' ∈ H" "s ∈ S" "s' ∈ S" and "g = h ⊗ s" and "g' = h' ⊗ s'" 
    unfolding set_mult_def by auto
  hence "g ⊗ g' = (h ⊗ s) ⊗ (h' ⊗ s')" by metis
  also from hh'ss' have inG: "h ∈ carrier G" "h' ∈ carrier G" "s ∈ carrier G" "s' ∈ carrier G" 
    using subgrpS mem_carrier subgroup.mem_carrier by force+
  hence "(h ⊗ s) ⊗ (h' ⊗ s') = h ⊗ (s ⊗ h') ⊗ s'" 
    using m_assoc by auto
  also from hh'ss' inG obtain h'' where h'': "h'' ∈ H" and "s ⊗ h' = h'' ⊗ s"
    using coset_eq unfolding r_coset_def l_coset_def 
    by fastforce
  hence "h ⊗ (s ⊗ h') ⊗ s' = h ⊗ (h'' ⊗ s) ⊗ s'" 
    by simp
  also from h'' inG have "... = (h ⊗ h'') ⊗ (s ⊗ s')" 
    using m_assoc mem_carrier by auto
  finally have "g ⊗ g' = h ⊗ h'' ⊗ (s ⊗ s')".
  moreover have "... ∈ H <#> S" 
    unfolding set_mult_def using h'' hh'ss' subgrpS subgroup.m_closed by fastforce
  ultimately show "g ⊗ g' ∈ H <#> S" 
    by simp
qed

lemma H_contained_in_set_mult:
  shows "H ⊆ H <#> S"
proof 
  fix x
  assume x: "x ∈ H"
  have "x ⊗ 𝟭 ∈ H <#> S" unfolding set_mult_def
    using second_isomorphism_grp.subgrpS second_isomorphism_grp_axioms subgroup.one_closed x by force
  with x show "x ∈ H <#> S" by (metis mem_carrier r_one)
qed

lemma S_contained_in_set_mult:
  shows "S ⊆ H <#> S"
proof
  fix s
  assume s: "s ∈ S"
  then have "𝟭 ⊗ s ∈ H <#> S" unfolding set_mult_def by force
  with s show "s ∈ H <#> S" using subgrpS subgroup.mem_carrier l_one by force
qed

lemma normal_intersection_hom:
  shows "group_hom (G⦇carrier := S⦈) ((G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈) Mod H) (λg. H #> g)"
proof -
  have "group ((G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈) Mod H)"
    by (simp add: H_contained_in_set_mult normal.factorgroup_is_group normal_axioms 
        normal_restrict_supergroup normal_set_mult_subgroup)
  moreover
  { fix g
    assume g: "g ∈ S"
    with g have "g ∈ H <#> S"
      using S_contained_in_set_mult by blast
    hence "H #> g ∈ carrier ((G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈) Mod H)" 
      unfolding FactGroup_def RCOSETS_def r_coset_def by auto }
  moreover
  have "⋀x y. ⟦x ∈ S; y ∈ S⟧ ⟹ H #> x ⊗ y = H #> x <#> (H #> y)"
    using normal.rcos_sum normal_axioms subgroup.mem_carrier subgrpS by fastforce
  ultimately show ?thesis
    by (auto simp: group_hom_def group_hom_axioms_def hom_def)
qed

lemma normal_intersection_hom_kernel:
  shows "kernel (G⦇carrier := S⦈) ((G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈) Mod H) (λg. H #> g) = H ∩ S"
proof -
  have "kernel (G⦇carrier := S⦈) ((G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈) Mod H) (λg. H #> g)
      = {g ∈ S. H #> g = 𝟭⇘(G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈) Mod H⇙}" 
    unfolding kernel_def by auto
  also have "... = {g ∈ S. H #> g = H}" 
    unfolding FactGroup_def by auto
  also have "... = {g ∈ S. g ∈ H}"
    by (meson coset_join1 is_group rcos_const subgroupE(1) subgroup_axioms subgrpS subset_eq)
  also have "... = H ∩ S" by auto
  finally show ?thesis.
qed

lemma normal_intersection_hom_surj:
  shows "(λg. H #> g) ` carrier (G⦇carrier := S⦈) = carrier ((G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈) Mod H)"
proof auto
  fix g
  assume "g ∈ S"
  hence "g ∈ H <#> S" 
    using S_contained_in_set_mult by auto
  thus "H #> g ∈ carrier ((G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈) Mod H)" 
    unfolding FactGroup_def RCOSETS_def r_coset_def by auto
next
  fix x
  assume "x ∈ carrier (G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈ Mod H)"
  then obtain h s where h: "h ∈ H" and s: "s ∈ S" and "x = H #> (h ⊗ s)"
    unfolding FactGroup_def RCOSETS_def r_coset_def set_mult_def by auto
  hence "x = (H #> h) #> s" 
    by (metis h s coset_mult_assoc mem_carrier subgroup.mem_carrier subgrpS subset)
  also have "... = H #> s" 
    by (metis h is_group rcos_const)
  finally have "x = H #> s".
  with s show "x ∈ (#>) H ` S" 
    by simp
qed

text ‹Finally we can prove the actual isomorphism theorem:›

theorem normal_intersection_quotient_isom:
  shows "(λX. the_elem ((λg. H #> g) ` X)) ∈ iso ((G⦇carrier := S⦈) Mod (H ∩ S)) (((G⦇carrier := H <#> S⦈)) Mod H)"
using normal_intersection_hom_kernel[symmetric] normal_intersection_hom normal_intersection_hom_surj
by (metis group_hom.FactGroup_iso_set)

end


corollary (in group) normal_subgroup_set_mult_closed:
  assumes "M ⊲ G" and "N ⊲ G"
  shows "M <#> N ⊲ G"
proof (rule normalI)
  from assms show "subgroup (M <#> N) G"
    using second_isomorphism_grp.normal_set_mult_subgroup normal_imp_subgroup
    unfolding second_isomorphism_grp_def second_isomorphism_grp_axioms_def by force
next
  show "∀x∈carrier G. M <#> N #> x = x <# (M <#> N)"
  proof
    fix x
    assume x: "x ∈ carrier G"
    have "M <#> N #> x = M <#> (N #> x)" 
      by (metis assms normal_inv_iff setmult_rcos_assoc subgroup.subset x)
    also have "… = M <#> (x <# N)" 
      by (metis assms(2) normal.coset_eq x)
    also have "… = (M #> x) <#> N" 
      by (metis assms normal_imp_subgroup rcos_assoc_lcos subgroup.subset x)
    also have "… = x <# (M <#> N)"
      by (simp add: assms normal.coset_eq normal_imp_subgroup setmult_lcos_assoc subgroup.subset x)
    finally show "M <#> N #> x = x <# (M <#> N)" .
  qed
qed

end