Theory WellType
section ‹Well-typedness of Jinja expressions›
theory WellType
imports "../Common/Objects" Expr
begin
type_synonym
env = "vname ⇀ ty"
inductive
WT :: "[J_prog,env, expr , ty ] ⇒ bool"
("_,_ ⊢ _ :: _" [51,51,51]50)
and WTs :: "[J_prog,env, expr list, ty list] ⇒ bool"
("_,_ ⊢ _ [::] _" [51,51,51]50)
for P :: J_prog
where
WTNew:
"is_class P C ⟹
P,E ⊢ new C :: Class C"
| WTCast:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e :: Class D; is_class P C; P ⊢ C ≼⇧* D ∨ P ⊢ D ≼⇧* C ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ Cast C e :: Class C"
| WTVal:
"typeof v = Some T ⟹
P,E ⊢ Val v :: T"
| WTVar:
"E V = Some T ⟹
P,E ⊢ Var V :: T"
| WTBinOpEq:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e⇩1 :: T⇩1; P,E ⊢ e⇩2 :: T⇩2; P ⊢ T⇩1 ≤ T⇩2 ∨ P ⊢ T⇩2 ≤ T⇩1 ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ e⇩1 «Eq» e⇩2 :: Boolean"
| WTBinOpAdd:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e⇩1 :: Integer; P,E ⊢ e⇩2 :: Integer ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ e⇩1 «Add» e⇩2 :: Integer"
| WTLAss:
"⟦ E V = Some T; P,E ⊢ e :: T'; P ⊢ T' ≤ T; V ≠ this ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ V:=e :: Void"
| WTFAcc:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e :: Class C; P ⊢ C sees F:T in D ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ e∙F{D} :: T"
| WTFAss:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e⇩1 :: Class C; P ⊢ C sees F:T in D; P,E ⊢ e⇩2 :: T'; P ⊢ T' ≤ T ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ e⇩1∙F{D}:=e⇩2 :: Void"
| WTCall:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e :: Class C; P ⊢ C sees M:Ts → T = (pns,body) in D;
P,E ⊢ es [::] Ts'; P ⊢ Ts' [≤] Ts ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ e∙M(es) :: T"
| WTBlock:
"⟦ is_type P T; P,E(V ↦ T) ⊢ e :: T' ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ {V:T; e} :: T'"
| WTSeq:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e⇩1::T⇩1; P,E ⊢ e⇩2::T⇩2 ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ e⇩1;;e⇩2 :: T⇩2"
| WTCond:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e :: Boolean; P,E ⊢ e⇩1::T⇩1; P,E ⊢ e⇩2::T⇩2;
P ⊢ T⇩1 ≤ T⇩2 ∨ P ⊢ T⇩2 ≤ T⇩1; P ⊢ T⇩1 ≤ T⇩2 ⟶ T = T⇩2; P ⊢ T⇩2 ≤ T⇩1 ⟶ T = T⇩1 ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ if (e) e⇩1 else e⇩2 :: T"
| WTWhile:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e :: Boolean; P,E ⊢ c::T ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ while (e) c :: Void"
| WTThrow:
"P,E ⊢ e :: Class C ⟹
P,E ⊢ throw e :: Void"
| WTTry:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e⇩1 :: T; P,E(V ↦ Class C) ⊢ e⇩2 :: T; is_class P C ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ try e⇩1 catch(C V) e⇩2 :: T"
| WTNil:
"P,E ⊢ [] [::] []"
| WTCons:
"⟦ P,E ⊢ e :: T; P,E ⊢ es [::] Ts ⟧
⟹ P,E ⊢ e#es [::] T#Ts"
declare WT_WTs.intros[intro!]
lemmas WT_WTs_induct = WT_WTs.induct [split_format (complete)]
and WT_WTs_inducts = WT_WTs.inducts [split_format (complete)]
lemma [iff]: "(P,E ⊢ [] [::] Ts) = (Ts = [])"
by (rule iffI) (auto elim: WTs.cases)
lemma [iff]: "(P,E ⊢ e#es [::] T#Ts) = (P,E ⊢ e :: T ∧ P,E ⊢ es [::] Ts)"
by (rule iffI) (auto elim: WTs.cases)
lemma [iff]: "(P,E ⊢ (e#es) [::] Ts) =
(∃U Us. Ts = U#Us ∧ P,E ⊢ e :: U ∧ P,E ⊢ es [::] Us)"
by (rule iffI) (auto elim: WTs.cases)
lemma [iff]: "⋀Ts. (P,E ⊢ es⇩1 @ es⇩2 [::] Ts) =
(∃Ts⇩1 Ts⇩2. Ts = Ts⇩1 @ Ts⇩2 ∧ P,E ⊢ es⇩1 [::] Ts⇩1 ∧ P,E ⊢ es⇩2[::]Ts⇩2)"
proof(induct es⇩1 type:list)
case (Cons a list)
let ?lhs = "(∃U Us. Ts = U # Us ∧ P,E ⊢ a :: U ∧
(∃Ts⇩1 Ts⇩2. Us = Ts⇩1 @ Ts⇩2 ∧ P,E ⊢ list [::] Ts⇩1 ∧ P,E ⊢ es⇩2 [::] Ts⇩2))"
let ?rhs = "(∃Ts⇩1 Ts⇩2. Ts = Ts⇩1 @ Ts⇩2 ∧
(∃U Us. Ts⇩1 = U # Us ∧ P,E ⊢ a :: U ∧ P,E ⊢ list [::] Us) ∧ P,E ⊢ es⇩2 [::] Ts⇩2)"
{ assume ?lhs
then have ?rhs by (auto intro: Cons_eq_appendI)
}
moreover {
assume ?rhs
then have ?lhs by fastforce
}
ultimately have "?lhs = ?rhs" by(rule iffI)
then show ?case by (clarsimp simp: Cons)
qed simp
lemma [iff]: "P,E ⊢ Val v :: T = (typeof v = Some T)"
proof(rule iffI) qed (auto elim: WT.cases)
lemma [iff]: "P,E ⊢ Var V :: T = (E V = Some T)"
proof(rule iffI) qed (auto elim: WT.cases)
lemma [iff]: "P,E ⊢ e⇩1;;e⇩2 :: T⇩2 = (∃T⇩1. P,E ⊢ e⇩1::T⇩1 ∧ P,E ⊢ e⇩2::T⇩2)"
proof(rule iffI) qed (auto elim: WT.cases)
lemma [iff]: "(P,E ⊢ {V:T; e} :: T') = (is_type P T ∧ P,E(V↦T) ⊢ e :: T')"
proof(rule iffI) qed (auto elim: WT.cases)
inductive_cases WT_elim_cases[elim!]:
"P,E ⊢ V :=e :: T"
"P,E ⊢ if (e) e⇩1 else e⇩2 :: T"
"P,E ⊢ while (e) c :: T"
"P,E ⊢ throw e :: T"
"P,E ⊢ try e⇩1 catch(C V) e⇩2 :: T"
"P,E ⊢ Cast D e :: T"
"P,E ⊢ a∙F{D} :: T"
"P,E ⊢ a∙F{D} := v :: T"
"P,E ⊢ e⇩1 «bop» e⇩2 :: T"
"P,E ⊢ new C :: T"
"P,E ⊢ e∙M(ps) :: T"
lemma wt_env_mono:
"P,E ⊢ e :: T ⟹ (⋀E'. E ⊆⇩m E' ⟹ P,E' ⊢ e :: T)" and
"P,E ⊢ es [::] Ts ⟹ (⋀E'. E ⊆⇩m E' ⟹ P,E' ⊢ es [::] Ts)"
proof(induct rule: WT_WTs_inducts)
case WTVar then show ?case by(simp add: map_le_def dom_def)
next
case WTLAss then show ?case by(force simp:map_le_def)
qed fastforce+
lemma WT_fv: "P,E ⊢ e :: T ⟹ fv e ⊆ dom E"
and "P,E ⊢ es [::] Ts ⟹ fvs es ⊆ dom E"
proof(induct rule:WT_WTs.inducts)
case WTVar then show ?case by fastforce
next
case WTLAss then show ?case by fastforce
next
case WTBlock then show ?case by fastforce
next
case WTTry then show ?case by fastforce
qed simp_all
end