Theory Slicing.Labels

section ‹Labels›

theory Labels imports Com begin

text ‹Labels describe a mapping from the inner node label 
  to the matching command›

inductive labels :: "cmd ⇒ nat ⇒ cmd ⇒ bool"
where

Labels_Base:
  "labels c 0 c"

| Labels_LAss:
  "labels (V:=e) 1 Skip"

| Labels_Seq1: 
  "labels c⇩1 l c ⟹ labels (c⇩1;;c⇩2) l (c;;c⇩2)"

| Labels_Seq2: 
  "labels c⇩2 l c ⟹ labels (c⇩1;;c⇩2) (l + #:c⇩1) c"

| Labels_CondTrue:
  "labels c⇩1 l c ⟹ labels (if (b) c⇩1 else c⇩2) (l + 1) c"

| Labels_CondFalse:
  "labels c⇩2 l c ⟹ labels (if (b) c⇩1 else c⇩2) (l + #:c⇩1 + 1) c"

| Labels_WhileBody:
  "labels c' l c ⟹ labels (while(b) c') (l + 2) (c;;while(b) c')"

| Labels_WhileExit:
  "labels (while(b) c') 1 Skip"

lemma label_less_num_inner_nodes:
  "labels c l c' ⟹ l < #:c"
proof(induct c arbitrary:l c')
  case Skip 
  from ‹labels Skip l c'› show ?case by(fastforce elim:labels.cases)
next
  case (LAss V e) 
  from ‹labels (V:=e) l c'› show ?case by(fastforce elim:labels.cases)
next
  case (Seq c⇩1 c⇩2)
  note IH1 = ‹⋀l c'. labels c⇩1 l c' ⟹ l < #:c⇩1›
  note IH2 = ‹⋀l c'. labels c⇩2 l c' ⟹ l < #:c⇩2›
  from ‹labels (c⇩1;;c⇩2) l c'› IH1 IH2 show ?case
    by simp(erule labels.cases,auto,force)
next
  case (Cond b c⇩1 c⇩2)
  note IH1 = ‹⋀l c'. labels c⇩1 l c' ⟹ l < #:c⇩1›
  note IH2 = ‹⋀l c'. labels c⇩2 l c' ⟹ l < #:c⇩2›
  from ‹labels (if (b) c⇩1 else c⇩2) l c'› IH1 IH2 show ?case
    by simp(erule labels.cases,auto,force)
next
  case (While b c)
  note IH = ‹⋀l c'. labels c l c' ⟹ l < #:c›
  from ‹labels (while (b) c) l c'› IH show ?case
    by simp(erule labels.cases,fastforce+)
qed


declare One_nat_def [simp del]

lemma less_num_inner_nodes_label:
  "l < #:c ⟹ ∃c'. labels c l c'"
proof(induct c arbitrary:l)
  case Skip
  from ‹l < #:Skip› have "l = 0" by simp
  thus ?case by(fastforce intro:Labels_Base)
next
  case (LAss V e)
  from ‹l < #:(V:=e)› have "l = 0 ∨ l = 1" by auto
  thus ?case by(auto intro:Labels_Base Labels_LAss)
next
  case (Seq c⇩1 c⇩2)
  note IH1 = ‹⋀l. l < #:c⇩1 ⟹ ∃c'. labels c⇩1 l c'›
  note IH2 = ‹⋀l. l < #:c⇩2 ⟹ ∃c'. labels c⇩2 l c'›
  show ?case
  proof(cases "l < #:c⇩1")
    case True
    from IH1[OF this] obtain c' where "labels c⇩1 l c'" by auto
    hence "labels (c⇩1;;c⇩2) l (c';;c⇩2)" by(fastforce intro:Labels_Seq1)
    thus ?thesis by auto
  next
    case False
    hence "#:c⇩1 ≤ l" by simp
    then obtain l' where "l = l' + #:c⇩1" and "l' = l - #:c⇩1" by simp
    from ‹l = l' + #:c⇩1› ‹l < #:c⇩1;;c⇩2› have "l' < #:c⇩2" by simp
    from IH2[OF this] obtain c' where "labels c⇩2 l' c'" by auto
    with ‹l = l' + #:c⇩1› have "labels (c⇩1;;c⇩2) l c'" by(fastforce intro:Labels_Seq2)
    thus ?thesis by auto
  qed
next
  case (Cond b c⇩1 c⇩2)
  note IH1 = ‹⋀l. l < #:c⇩1 ⟹ ∃c'. labels c⇩1 l c'›
  note IH2 = ‹⋀l. l < #:c⇩2 ⟹ ∃c'. labels c⇩2 l c'›
  show ?case
  proof(cases "l = 0")
    case True
    thus ?thesis by(fastforce intro:Labels_Base)
  next
    case False
    hence "0 < l" by simp
    then obtain l' where "l = l' + 1" and "l' = l - 1" by simp
    thus ?thesis
    proof(cases "l' < #:c⇩1")
      case True
      from IH1[OF this] obtain c' where "labels c⇩1 l' c'" by auto
      with ‹l = l' + 1› have "labels (if (b) c⇩1 else c⇩2) l c'"
        by(fastforce dest:Labels_CondTrue)
      thus ?thesis by auto
    next
      case False
      hence "#:c⇩1 ≤ l'" by simp
      then obtain l'' where "l' = l'' + #:c⇩1" and "l'' = l' - #:c⇩1" by simp
      from ‹l' = l'' + #:c⇩1› ‹l = l' + 1› ‹l < #:if (b) c⇩1 else c⇩2›
      have "l'' < #:c⇩2" by simp
      from IH2[OF this] obtain c' where "labels c⇩2 l'' c'" by auto
      with ‹l' = l'' + #:c⇩1› ‹l = l' + 1› have "labels (if (b) c⇩1 else c⇩2) l c'"
        by(fastforce dest:Labels_CondFalse)
      thus ?thesis by auto
    qed
  qed
next
  case (While b c')
  note IH = ‹⋀l. l < #:c' ⟹ ∃c''. labels c' l c''›
  show ?case
  proof(cases "l < 1")
    case True
    hence "l = 0" by simp
    thus ?thesis by(fastforce intro:Labels_Base)
  next
    case False
    show ?thesis
    proof(cases "l < 2")
      case True
      with ‹¬ l < 1› have "l = 1" by simp
      thus ?thesis by(fastforce intro:Labels_WhileExit)
    next
      case False
      with ‹¬ l < 1› have "2 ≤ l" by simp
      then obtain l' where "l = l' + 2" and "l' = l - 2" 
        by(simp del:add_2_eq_Suc')
      from ‹l = l' + 2› ‹l < #:while (b) c'› have "l' < #:c'" by simp
      from IH[OF this] obtain c'' where "labels c' l' c''" by auto
      with ‹l = l' + 2› have "labels (while (b) c') l (c'';;while (b) c')"
        by(fastforce dest:Labels_WhileBody)
      thus ?thesis by auto
    qed
  qed
qed



lemma labels_det:
  "labels c l c'⟹ (⋀c''. labels c l c''⟹ c' = c'')"
proof(induct rule: labels.induct)
  case (Labels_Base c c'') 
  from ‹labels c 0 c''› obtain l where "labels c l c''" and "l = 0" by auto
  thus ?case by(induct rule: labels.induct,auto)
next
  case (Labels_Seq1 c⇩1 l c c⇩2)
  note IH = ‹⋀c''. labels c⇩1 l c'' ⟹ c = c''›
  from ‹labels c⇩1 l c› have "l < #:c⇩1" by(fastforce intro:label_less_num_inner_nodes)
  with ‹labels (c⇩1;;c⇩2) l c''› obtain cx where "c'' = cx;;c⇩2 ∧ labels c⇩1 l cx"
    by(fastforce elim:labels.cases intro:Labels_Base)
  hence [simp]:"c'' = cx;;c⇩2" and "labels c⇩1 l cx" by simp_all
  from IH[OF ‹labels c⇩1 l cx›] show ?case by simp
next
  case (Labels_Seq2 c⇩2 l c c⇩1)
  note IH = ‹⋀c''. labels c⇩2 l c'' ⟹ c = c''›
  from ‹labels (c⇩1;;c⇩2) (l + #:c⇩1) c''› ‹labels c⇩2 l c› have "labels c⇩2 l c''" 
    by(auto elim:labels.cases dest:label_less_num_inner_nodes)
  from IH[OF this] show ?case .
next
  case (Labels_CondTrue c⇩1 l c b c⇩2)
  note IH = ‹⋀c''. labels c⇩1 l c'' ⟹  c = c''›
  from ‹labels (if (b) c⇩1 else c⇩2) (l + 1) c''› ‹labels c⇩1 l c› have "labels c⇩1 l c''"
    by(fastforce elim:labels.cases dest:label_less_num_inner_nodes)
  from IH[OF this] show ?case .
next
  case (Labels_CondFalse c⇩2 l c b c⇩1)
  note IH = ‹⋀c''. labels c⇩2 l c'' ⟹  c = c''›
  from ‹labels (if (b) c⇩1 else c⇩2) (l + #:c⇩1 + 1) c''› ‹labels c⇩2 l c›
  have "labels c⇩2 l c''"
    by(fastforce elim:labels.cases dest:label_less_num_inner_nodes)
  from IH[OF this] show ?case .
next
  case (Labels_WhileBody c' l c b)
  note IH = ‹⋀c''. labels c' l c'' ⟹ c = c''›
  from ‹labels (while (b) c') (l + 2) c''› ‹labels c' l c› 
  obtain cx where "c'' = cx;;while (b) c' ∧ labels c' l cx" 
    by -(erule labels.cases,auto)
  hence [simp]:"c'' = cx;;while (b) c'" and "labels c' l cx" by simp_all
  from IH[OF ‹labels c' l cx›] show ?case by simp
qed (fastforce elim:labels.cases)+


end